Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999 vs Mazda Premacy 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 225 NM | 161 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 35 HP more power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 64 NM more than Mazda Premacy. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
The Mazda Premacy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
820 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
700 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Premacy engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 40 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Space Runner | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.60 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.57 m | |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is larger. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 30 cm longer than the Mazda Premacy, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 8 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 370 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 240 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 370 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
240 litres | 1848 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 1608 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda Premacy. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 1`760 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | high | |
Mazda Premacy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mazda Premacy quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |