Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999 vs Chrysler Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 151 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 1 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.6 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 40 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Space Runner | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Chrysler Voyager 1996 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Voyager 1996 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 13 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
240 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
| |