Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999 vs Seat Alhambra 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 35 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Seat Alhambra. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 3 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
240 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.9 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |