Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999 vs Citroen C8 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Space Wagon) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Citroen C8) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 20 HP more power than Citroen C8, but torque is 90 NM less than Citroen C8. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C8 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C8 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 40 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Space Runner | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Ulysse, Peugeot 607 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 13 cm shorter than the Citroen C8, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
240 litres | 2948 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C8 (by 2708 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.1 metres more than that of the Citroen C8. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Citroen C8 has
| |