Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1991 vs Honda CR-V 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi Space Wagon also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 133 HP | 128 - 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 146 - 176 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 17.8 seconds | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 - 10.8 | 9.7 - 10.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 2 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | 670 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has 163 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 1044 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`927 | ~ 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |