Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1991 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Picnic can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 133 HP | 90 - 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 146 - 176 NM | 178 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 17.8 seconds | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 - 10.8 | 7.7 - 9.5 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Picnic. On average, Mitsubishi Space Wagon equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Picnic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | 1840 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Wagon has 32 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The Toyota Picnic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 126 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`927 | ~ 2`007 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |