Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 215 HP | 90 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 - 299 NM | 170 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 13.1 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 11.2 | 6.2 - 11.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Sharan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | no data | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has 16 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`170 | ~ 1`954 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |