Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998 vs Ford Galaxy 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Galaxy can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol) | 1.9 - 2.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 215 HP | 90 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 - 299 NM | 170 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 13.1 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 11.2 | 6.2 - 11.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`170 | ~ 1`933 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |