Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998 vs Honda Stream 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.7 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 215 HP | 125 - 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 - 299 NM | 154 - 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 13.1 seconds | 9.4 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 11.2 | 7.7 - 9.1 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Stream. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is larger. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 3 cm longer than the Honda Stream, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 158 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | 1520 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Wagon has 82 litres more trunk space than the Honda Stream. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`170 | ~ 1`974 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Honda Stream has
| |