Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991 vs Citroen Nemo 2009

 
Mitsubishi Space Runner
1991 - 1999
Citroen Nemo
2009 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 122 HP73 HP
Torque: 161 NM118 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds16.2 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Runner is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 49 HP more power than Citroen Nemo, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Citroen Nemo. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.86.6
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 480 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 560 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
670 km on highway800 km on highway
Citroen Nemo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m3.96 m
Width: 1.70 m1.72 m
Height: 1.66 m1.72 m
Mitsubishi Space Runner is 31 cm longer than the Citroen Nemo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 676 litres356 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1498 litresno data
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage capacity.
Mitsubishi Space Runner has 320 litres more trunk space than the Citroen Nemo.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8001`690
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 6002400
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Runner has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Citroen Nemo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv