Mitsubishi Space Runner 1997 vs Citroen C4 2008
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 24 HP more power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Citroen C4. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 7.1 | |
|
The Citroen C4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 45 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Citroen C4 2008 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen C4 2008 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.46 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner and Citroen C4 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 314 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | 1083 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Runner has 362 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 415 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 1.1 metres less than that of the Citroen C4, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`745 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |