Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi Space Runner) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Space Wagon) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 54 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Runner over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Runner gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 33 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 676 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | 1930 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 432 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |