Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 vs Ford Galaxy 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 82 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 172 NM | 202 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 17.1 seconds | |
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 8 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 6.5 | |
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.27 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.73 m | |
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 35 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |