Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 vs Chrysler Voyager 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 82 HP | 114 HP | |
Torque: | 172 NM | 262 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
Chrysler Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 32 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.2 | |
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Runner over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.27 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 46 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 1.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 7.7/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |