Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 vs Volkswagen Jetta 2005
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Jetta is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 58 HP less power than Volkswagen Jetta, whereas torque is 148 NM less than Volkswagen Jetta. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 8.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 5.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Jetta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Jetta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Jetta gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Jetta 2005 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Jetta 2005 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 28 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Jetta, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Runner has 149 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Jetta. The Volkswagen Jetta may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Jetta, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Volkswagen Jetta has
| |