Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Picnic is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 8 HP less power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Toyota Picnic. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.7 | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.62 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is 26 cm shorter than the Toyota Picnic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | 1840 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Runner has 496 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The Toyota Picnic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 342 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |