Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 43 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 5.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.52 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is 24 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | 1370 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Runner has 306 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 128 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |