Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 vs Citroen C4 2008
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 56 HP less power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 148 NM less than Citroen C4. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 5.3 | |
|
The Citroen C4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Citroen C4 2008 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Citroen C4 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.46 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner and Citroen C4 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | 1083 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Runner has 326 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 415 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.6 metres less than that of the Citroen C4, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |