Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991 vs Volkswagen Jetta 2006

 
Mitsubishi Space Runner
1991 - 1999
Volkswagen Jetta
2006 - 2008
Body: Minivan / MPVSedan
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 120 HP102 HP
Torque: 162 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds13 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Runner is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 18 HP more power than Volkswagen Jetta, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Volkswagen Jetta. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.38.2
The Volkswagen Jetta is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Jetta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 165 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
780 km on highway850 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m4.55 m
Width: 1.70 m1.78 m
Height: 1.66 m1.46 m
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller, but higher.
Mitsubishi Space Runner is 28 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Jetta, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 20 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 676 litres527 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1498 litresno data
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Runner has 149 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Jetta. The Volkswagen Jetta may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.2 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Jetta, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`900
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 6002000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Runner has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Volkswagen Jetta has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • electric power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv