Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 4 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, but torque is 8 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Runner over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 35 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 1.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |