Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991 vs Chrysler Voyager 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 43 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 98 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 12.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 11.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Runner over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Runner gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 25 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 2.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |