Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 36 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 113 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 13.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 12.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Runner over 15,000 km in a year you can save 675 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Runner gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Grand Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 80 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 671 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | 4880 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner has 5 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 3382 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 1.8 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 7.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |