Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991 vs Seat Alhambra 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 4 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, but torque is 8 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.9 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Runner over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 580'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Alhambra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 35 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 1.5 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |