Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991 vs Citroen Nemo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 16.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 47 HP more power than Citroen Nemo, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Citroen Nemo. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Nemo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is 31 cm longer than the Citroen Nemo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Runner has 320 litres more trunk space than the Citroen Nemo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Citroen Nemo has
| |