Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Toyota Yaris 2007
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 3 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 7.2 | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 45 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine: This engine is generally considered decent, with a lifespan of around 250,000 km. While it doesn’t cause major issues if properly maintained, some common problems still arise.
One of the most frequent ... More about Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is 49 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Runner has 155 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |