Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Space Runner) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Space Wagon) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 17.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 54 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.58 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is 21 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 212 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | 1714 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 86 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |