Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 161 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 14 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 45 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.58 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is 23 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | 1714 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Runner has 218 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. The Mitsubishi Space Wagon may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 86 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |