Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Ford Galaxy 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 17.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 46 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, but torque is 24 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 6.5 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 33 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |