Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Opel Combo 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 65 HP | |
Torque: | 178 NM | 130 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 18.5 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Space Runner is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 71 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Opel Combo. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 5.4 | |
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
Opel Combo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.29 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.80 m | |
Mitsubishi Space Runner is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 15 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 455 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
Opel Combo has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Runner has 25 litres less trunk space than the Opel Combo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.8 metres less than that of the Opel Combo, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`990 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Opel Combo has
| |