Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Space Runner) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Citroen Xsara Picasso) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 46 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, but torque is 27 NM less than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 5.5 | |
|
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 555 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 45 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is 1 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Runner has 120 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Runner uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 1.1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |