Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 7 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.0 | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 45 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 407, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 18 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Runner has 70 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.9 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |