Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi Space Runner is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 133 HP | 136 - 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 - 176 NM | 178 - 299 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 17.8 seconds | 10.7 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 9.8 | 9.2 - 11.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 33 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | 1930 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Runner has 436 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. The Mitsubishi Space Wagon may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 432 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`773 | ~ 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |