Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991 vs Chrysler Voyager 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.5 - 3.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 133 HP | 99 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 - 176 NM | 179 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 17.8 seconds | 12.3 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 9.8 | 6.7 - 13.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Voyager. On average, Mitsubishi Space Runner equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 25 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 671 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | no data | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner has 5 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 2.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`773 | ~ 1`511 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |