Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Space Star can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 133 HP | 82 - 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 - 176 NM | 117 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 17.8 seconds | 10.2 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 9.8 | 5.5 - 8.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Star. On average, Mitsubishi Space Runner equipped with diesel engines consume 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.52 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is 24 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1498 litres | 1370 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Runner has 306 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 128 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`773 kg | ~ 1`698 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`248 kg | ~ 1`234 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 525 kg | ~ 464 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Therefore, Mitsubishi Space Runner is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |