Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991 vs Citroen Nemo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Citroen Nemo is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Citroen Nemo can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 133 HP | 68 - 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 - 176 NM | 118 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 17.8 seconds | 16.2 - 18 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 9.8 | 4.5 - 6.6 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Nemo. On average, Mitsubishi Space Runner equipped with diesel engines consume 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is 31 cm longer than the Citroen Nemo, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Runner has 316 litres more trunk space than the Citroen Nemo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`773 | ~ 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Citroen Nemo has
| |