Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Toyota Yaris 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 150 HP | 69 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 - 225 NM | 93 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 13.3 seconds | 9.3 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.1 | 4.5 - 7.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner petrol engines consumes on average 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Yaris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 3.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is 53 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Runner has 155 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`900 | ~ 886 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |