Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 202 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 4 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 13.1 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 33 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1253 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Pajero has 689 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 794 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`427 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 240 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |