Mitsubishi Pajero 1991 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2000

 
Mitsubishi Pajero
1991 - 1997
Suzuki Grand Vitara
2000 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 147 HP158 HP
Torque: 211 NM213 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.1 seconds
Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 11 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data10.9
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres66 litres

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 39 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space WagonUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.22 m
Width: 1.70 m1.78 m
Height: 1.86 m1.74 m
Mitsubishi Pajero is 44 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 1080 litres258 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 1080 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data258 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2050 litres1080 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 970 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters9.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 2.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`6501`950
Safety: no data
Quality:Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 265 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 36002200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • timing belt engine
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv