Mitsubishi Pajero 1991 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 147 HP | 158 HP | |
Torque: | 211 NM | 213 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 11 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 66 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 40 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.22 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.86 m | 1.74 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is 44 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | 258 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 1080 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 258 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 1080 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 970 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 2.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`650 | 1`950 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 265 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 4400 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |