Mitsubishi Pajero 1996 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 181 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 255 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 31 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 118 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 11.7 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`650 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Jeep Grand Cherokee has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Pajero, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |