Mitsubishi Pajero 1998 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 245 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 343 NM | 295 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 55 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 16.0 | |
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 78 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 6 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 1350 litres | 1104 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 1350 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 1104 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | 2047 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 553 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.1 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`425 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | Jeep Grand Cherokee has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 3600 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |