Mitsubishi Pajero 1998 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 47 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 31 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 13.1 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1350 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 1350 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | 2047 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 553 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.7 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`427 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |