Mitsubishi Pajero 2014 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Pajero) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo XC90) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 261 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 47 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 209 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 5.8 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 6.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 960 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 663 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1886 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Pajero has 48 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`810 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |