Mitsubishi Pajero 2014 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 261 NM | 625 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 332 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 364 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 12.8 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 32 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Jaguar XJ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Pajero engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 663 litres | 784 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 121 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.7 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`810 | 3`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 37 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |