Mitsubishi Pajero 2014 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi Pajero) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 248 HP | |
| Torque: | 261 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 70 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 339 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 7.3 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 735 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 32 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 663 litres | 784 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 121 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`810 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 37 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |