Mitsubishi Pajero 2011 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 52 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 13.1 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 29 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 663 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 441 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`910 | 2`427 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |