Mitsubishi Pajero 2011 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 1 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 51 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 13.6 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 663 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`910 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |