Mitsubishi Pajero 2011 vs Toyota Highlander 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 250 HP | 280 HP | |
Torque: | 329 NM | 337 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
Toyota Highlander is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 30 HP less power than Toyota Highlander, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Toyota Highlander. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 8.4 | |
The Toyota Highlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 5.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Highlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 765 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
780 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.90 m | 4.87 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.93 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.73 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Highlander, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 14 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 663 litres | 391 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 391 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 663 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 5.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`910 | 2`844 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 21 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |