Mitsubishi Pajero 2011 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 5 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, but torque is 53 NM less than Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 12.6 | |
|
The Toyota 4-Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 663 litres | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2050 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`910 kg | 2`440 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |