Mitsubishi Pajero 2009 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 441 NM | 343 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 27 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 98 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 9.5 | |
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 87 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
1180 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.90 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`910 | 2`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 11 600 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |