Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Jeep Cherokee 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 202 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 NM | 301 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 24 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 14.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.7 l/100km | 14.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 29 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Jeep Cherokee 1997 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1011 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2033 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |